Publications
Veuillez-vous connecter pour avoir accès
à vos informations pour les
membres
AV et d'autres méthodologies
The Strategyzer approach to identifying the value proposition differs from the value management approach to identifying the value proposition. This presentation compares both approaches and identifies how the Value Analysis methodology can be improved through techniques from the Strategyzer approach and how the Value Proposition in the Strategyzer approach can be improved with value management techniques.
Project controls enable business to better predict and manage outcomes. Controlling costs can be supported with accounting tools and techniques such as Lean and Six Sigma but controlling outcomes relies on a different sort of control tool. VE is a tool that can be integrated with other business tools to guide or control project outcomes. This presentation describes how VE works with other business tools for big projects. I focus on the interactions between VE and other business tools when confronting the “big project” issues described by Bent Flyvbjerg
- Solves a problem
- Delivers specific benefits
- Identifies why your solution is unique
A value proposition must demonstrate to clients why your product or solution will reliably deliver benefits. This presentation shows how using Value Management together with the Business Model Strategyzer results in the development of Value Propositions that are both marketing oriented and design oriented. A market oriented solution ensures that customer needs are understood and a design oriented solution ensures that the proposed solution is reliable.
Le Value Design s'appuie sur les forces de l'analyse de la valeur, du design thinking et de la business analyse pour améliorer les résultats dans toute entreprise, service, produit ou projet. Les avantages de l'intégration de ces approches ont été illustrés par des études de cas. Ce webinaire et les diapositives sont en français. Certains des termes commerciaux utilisés sur les diapositives sont en anglais.
Depuis quelques années les processus de conception intégré (PCI) connaissent une popularité croissante auprès des donneurs d’ouvrage. Consciente que ce type de processus fera dorénavant partie du paysage des projets immobiliers, Analyse de la Valeur Canada a créé un projet de recherche afin d’évaluer la possibilité de coexistence et de contribution de l’AV à de tels processus. Cette conférence constitue un rapport d’étape du projet de recherche en question qui est dû pour 2018. Les principes de base du PCI tels qu’énoncés par le US Green Building Council et l’International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment (IISBE) sont présentés de même que leurs méthodologies respectives. À partir de cet exposé, l’auteur met en lumière la capacité potentielle qu’aura l’Analyse de la Valeur d’ajouter une plus-value au PCI et à ce dernier de bénéficier à la gestion de la Valeur. Enfin la conférence traite des dispositions humaines, légales et contractuelles requises pour un tel processus.
As we all know, Value Engineering and Value Analysis (VAVE) can be applied to products, processes, and services to improve the value to the purchaser, user, and/or the provider. This paper focuses on the development and production of products and equipment that are either sold to and used by customers (i.e. computer, digital camera, copier, etc.) or used within the context of a process or service provided to a customer (i.e. instrumentation, printing press, CNC machining center, etc.).
Value Design is the combination of 2 approaches: Value Management and Design Thinking. Both approaches want to fulfill an unsatisfied need and both have tools to do so, but somewhat incomplete. The synergy between the 2 approaches helps professionals/designers achieve even better value when designing a new product, service or process. This presentation will explain quickly what is each approach and how the combination of the 2 allows for a greater leverage of functions, cost and client satisfaction. It focuses on the best tools in each approach and how combining them improves the success of your design project.
for many years.
The Value Methodology, the oldest, most complete process for identifying problems or improvement opportunities in products, processes or services, has not been adopted nor does it enjoy the visibility of the more popular management tools in today's competitive environment. Total Quality Management, Theory of Constraints, Quality Function Deployment, Design of Experiments, Design for Manufacturing/Assembly, TRIZ, Target Costing, Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, etc., are a few of the tools being employed by organizations to resolve problems and improve their bottom line. While these tools may work well within their focus, many lack the broad scope necessary to resolve the overall business concern.
This paper will provide a brief survey of these tools and how they relate to the Value Methodology Job Plan. In many instances the most beneficial management approach would be to employ the value methodology as an overarching approach to addressing management concerns and inserting the appropriate tool when conditions warrant.
VE or Value Engineering is generally used in construction project management to present alternatives and strategies that can be implemented to solve problems, decrease cost and optimize quality.The decision making is often related to an optimum cost or value, however, at a time where climate change challenges mandate building resilient and less impactful infrastructure, it is critical for the construction sector to adopt systemic integration of sustainability impact factors to support the approval process of proposed construction projects.In addition to reviewing how the Value Engineering process may integrate sustainable impact factors, this presentation will look at the choice by advantages method (CBA method) to support the decision making of project managers following. Making the case for sustainable construction using mass timber will be showcased using the CBA method evaluation of alternatives.
Participants to this talk are expected to:
• Recognize sustainability impact factors in construction
• Correlate VE evaluation to sustainability in construction
• Define the “Choosing by Advantages” CBA method
• Integrate the CBA method to a VE case study